Current Situation of Humanistic Management †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Questions: Discuss about the Current Situation of Humanistic Management. Answers: Introduction: From the video, it is to be understood that taylorism has made significant contributions through changing the way of machine functioning, hence, enhancing the productivity. Fredrick Taylor has focused on the machines, industries and the mechanical drives in order to make sure that the production is speeding up (Bahrin et al. 2016). He has changed the entire process of managing the trade and labour market by concentrating on manufacturing simple and less costly cars. He had guided his workers and had divided their tasks into different sections, helping in the production of most efficient scientific shovelling. Taylor has scheduled their working hours in a thought that workers will be more satisfied when there will be rise in productivity. This idea of his has improved both the speed and efficiency of managing tasks. Along with this, this idea has also helped in bringing in huge industrialisation. As a result, it was seen that the workers were unsatisfied with the increase in their wor king hours. Hence, the workers in in Australia, America or Europe would not accept the concept of Taylorism in this form today. Yes, Taylorism could be seen in call centres, as people there would work longer hours in order to improve their productivity. As according to Taylorism, the concept of organised efficiency is the core aspect of managing business of not only car manufacturing companies or food manufacturing companies but is also there in the call centres as well (Mele 2013). Although it also the fact that the workforce is not happy with longer working hours system and it is one of the major problems in current days that has the potential to slow down the speed of business and could also result in business performance degradation. Fredrick Taylor has monitored every action of the workers and also pressurised them for increasing their level of production. Now a day, in call centres, the workers are given specific targets by the centre head to achieve within the assigned deadline, notwithstanding the situations or problems they might be facing in achieving their target. Such management favours the concep t of Taylorism. Though this clip has shown the history from 100 years ago, but still the ideas could not be considered as totally out of date. Though the world has moved on, but this idea is still lingering in todays world. There are many who are totally against the concept of Taylorism but still, there are people in todays era who believes that taylorism has played a great in improving the productivity of an organisation and it is also beneficial for workforce efficiency. Not only it has made great contribution to the business, but has also improved the life of the people via commitment and work. As stated by Taylor, more quantity of work would lead to more productivity and efficiency along with increase in speed of completion of work. However, with the introduction of advanced technologies, taylorism is not as influential in the present era as it was few years ago. Advancement in technologies has put less pressure on the workers and also has helped them in completing their tasks faster. As stated by Thomas Friedman there are many key drawbacks of living in the flat world of Globalisation 3.0. According to him, flat world is a platform with the absence of barriers. In this platform, people are free to communicate, collaborate and work along each other across the boundaries (Mohan 2015). However, there are certain disadvantages of living in a flat world of globalisation 3.0. Firstly, in this world, different people will posses different thoughts. With the same, the business ethics of the companies would lose their freedom. For example, MNCs would get shifted into the developing countries for reducing the cost. With the same, if there are no barriers, the people would start doing whatever they like to. They will start creating their own rules for conducting trade. Moreover, this theory of flat world would result in misunderstanding of the trends by the business executives. This in turn might result in strategic errors that are potentially very serious and at the same t ime is very risky as well. Yes, I agree with the Friedmans iron rule of the flat world. Advancement in new technologies would give people full freedom to do whatever they like to. For example, the case of Southwest airline is very common of all in this context. Southwest airline has consolidated a website where people could go online for the job of printing out and downloading their individual boarding passes equipped with bar code. In this way, every individual could become his own ticket agent and this will also let people to change them for learning something and to do whatever they like to do. No, globalization level is not uniform and invariable all around the world. It is very uneven in effects and process. The term globalization refers to the increase in integration in between the countries through opening the trade barriers and accessing capital and labour (Jaumotte and Papageorgiou 2013). It has also resulted in the countries introducing their markets in international completion. However, there are only few poor countries, which are still not grown or developed to that extent. Such poor countries are grown taking a long period of time, without introducing themselves in the trade market. It has also resulted in an international division of the labours between both currently developing and the developed countries. There are some countries where women work in agricultural sectors and they are less paid in comparison to the rest other countries. Globalization is also having an impact on the indigenous girls of Philippines in regards to health impacts. Along with that, glo balization has also resulted in imbalance in terms of ethnic, which have a very significant consequences for protecting and ensuring safety for the communities belonging from other parts of the world. Along with that, in some parts of the world, the Muslims are also being indicted for being involved in the events. Conclusion To sum up, this paper has the paper has thoroughly shed light on the concept of Taylorism through a systematic answering of the questions related to the video Ford and Taylorism. It is concisely shed light on Friedmans perception towards globalization that is growing with a fast pace in todays world. References Bahrin, M.A.K., Othman, M.F., Azli, N.H.N. and Talib, M.F., 2016. Industry 4.0: a review on industrial automation and robotic.Jurnal Teknologi,78(6), pp.137-143.. Jaumotte, F., Lall, S. and Papageorgiou, C., 2013. Rising income inequality: technology, or trade and financial globalization?.IMF Economic Review,61(2), pp.271-309. Mel, D., 2013. Antecedents and current situation of humanistic management.African Journal of Business Ethics,7(2), p.52. Mohan, B., 2015. Epilogue: Mendacity of Development. InGlobal Frontiers of Social Development in Theory and Practice(pp. 255-262). Palgrave Macmillan, New York.